- Meeting abstract
- Open Access
A case-controlled study of minimally invasive vs open hallux valgus surgery
© Curran et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015
- Published: 20 April 2015
- Learning Curve
- Small Incision
- Previous Attempt
- Consecutive Case
- High Satisfaction
Previous attempts at small incision hallux valgus surgery have compromised the principles of bunion correction in order to minimise the incision. The Minimally Invasive Chevron/ Akin (MICA) is a technique that enables an open modified Chevron/ Akin to be done through a 3mm incision, facilitated by a 2mm Shannon burr.
This is a consecutive case series performed between 2009 and 2012. This includes the learning curve for minimally invasive surgery. All cases were performed by a single surgeon at two different sites, one centre where minimally invasive surgery is available and the other where it is not. The standard procedure in both centres is a modified Chevron osteotomy. Regardless of whether the osteotomy was performed open or minimally invasive two-screw fixation was performed.
Retrospective analysis includes the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), metatarsal 1 (M1) length, forefoot width and forefoot: hindfoot ratio. Clinical outcomes include the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons (AOFAS) questionniare, and assessment of complications.
There were 70 cases in each arm. Follow-up was 4 years to 6 months. The radiological outcomes were similar in both groups. There was an increased rate of screw removal in the MICA group. There were also cases of hallux varus, these occurred in the cases with severe pre-operative IMA angles that also had a lateral release and an Akin. There was high satisfaction in both groups.
This is the only comparison of minimally invasive and open techniques that has been performed, providing a direct comparison of the utility of a burr compared to a saw. These early results demonstrate the efficacy of a Minimally Invasive Chevron/ Akin in terms of achieving radiological correction. The clinical outcomes are excellent but there is a learning curve and this needs to be managed.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.