Skip to main content

Table 5 Criterion validity summary statistics for clinician (Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value) & inter-rater reliability between expert and clinician (Kappa and strength of agreement)

From: The Queensland high risk foot form (QHRFF) – is it a reliable and valid clinical research tool for foot disease?

QHRFF field

%

K(SE)

Strength of agreement [[37]]

Sensitivity (95% CI)

Specificity (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

General demographics

      

Any indigenous status

100

--

--

--

1.00 (0.90-1.00)

--

Health professionals attending (in the past week)

   

Podiatrist

88.4

--

--

0.88 (0.74-0.96)

--

0.88 (0.74-0.96)

GP

81.4

0.39 (0.17)

Fair

0.40 (0.14-0.73)

0.94 (0.78-0.99)

0.67 (0.24-0.94)

Nurse

79.1

0.37 (0.16)

Fair

0.33 (0.11-0.65)

0.97 (0.81-1.00)

0.80 (0.30-0.99)

Orthotist

100

--

--

--

1.00 (0.90–1.00)

--

Physician

97.6

0.66 (0.32)

Substantial

1.00 (0.05-1.00)

0.98 (0.86-1.00)

0.50 (0.03-0.97)

Surgeon

90.7

0.45 (0.23)

Moderate

0.67 (0.13-0.98)

0.93 (0.79-0.98)

0.40 (0.07-0.83)

Other

100

--

--

--

0.98 (0.86-1.00)

--

Medical co-morbidity history

   

Any medical (diabetes) history

100

100 (0.01)

Near perfect

1.00 (0.88-1.00)

1.00 (0.60-1.00)

1.00 (0.88-1.00)

Diabetes duration#

 

0.95 (0.90–0.97)

Strong

   

Recent BGLs > 15 mmol/L

90.7

0.62 (0.17)

Substantial

1.00 (0.40-1.00)

0.90 (0.75-0.97)

0.50 (0.17-0.83)

HbA1c result#

 

1.00 (0.99–1.00)

Strong

   

Hypertension

86.0

0.68 (0.12)

Substantial

0.87 (0.68-0.96)

0.85 (0.54-0.97)

0.93 (0.75-0.99)

Dyslipidaemia

79.1

0.58 (0.12)

Moderate

0.76 (0.54-0.90)

0.83 (0.58-0.96)

0.86 (0.64-0.96)

Smoker

88.4

0.69 (0.13)

Substantial

0.73 (0.39-0.93)

0.94 (0.78-0.99)

0.80 (0.44-0.96)

CVD

79.1

0.58 (0.12)

Moderate

0.71 (0.48-0.88)

0.86 (0.64-0.96)

0.83 (0.58-0.96)

CKD

86.0

0.65 (0.13)

Substantial

0.69 (0.39-0.90)

0.93 (0.76-0.99)

0.82 (0.48-0.97)

ESRF

97.7

0.66 (0.32)

Substantial

1.00 (0.05-1.00)

0.98 (0.86-1.00)

0.50 (0.03-0.97)

Other (non-listed)

79.1

0.19 (0.19)

Slight

0.89 (0.73-0.96)

0.29 (0.05-0.7)

0.86 (0.70-0.95)

High-risk history

   

Neuropathy

93.0

0.73 (0.15)

Substantial

0.95 (0.80-0.99)

0.83 (0.36-0.99)

0.97 (0.84-1.00)

PAD

86.0

0.72 (0.10)

Substantial

0.76 (0.52-0.91)

0.95 (0.75-1.00)

0.94 (0.69-1.00)

Previous foot ulcer

79.1

0.28 (0.18)

Fair

0.84 (0.67-0.93)

0.50 (0.14-0.86)

0.91 (0.75-0.98)

Current foot ulcer

97.7

--

--

1.00 (0.90-1.00)

0 (0 – 0.95)

0.98 (0.86-1.00)

New foot ulcer

97.4

--

--

0.90 (0.76-0.97)

0 (0 – 0.95)

0.97 (0.85-0.99)

Previous amputation

95.3

0.90 (0.07)

Near perfect

0.88 (0.62-0.98)

1.00 (0.84-1.00)

1.00 (0.75-1.00)

Clinical diagnoses of high-risk factors

   

Neuropathy

100

1.00 (0.01)

Near perfect

1.00 (0.89-1.00)

1.00 (0.46-1.00)

1.00 (0.89-1.00)

Any PAD

95.3

0.91 (0.06)

Near perfect

0.91 (0.69-0.98)

1.00 (0.81-1.00)

1.00 (0.80-1.00)

Acute Charcot

100

1.00 (0.01)

Near perfect

1.00 (0.05-1.00)

1.00 (0.90-1.00)

1.00 (0.05-1.00)

Foot deformity

93.0

0.80 (0.11)

Substantial

0.97 (0.82-1.00)

0.80 (0.44-0.96)

0.94 (0.79-0.99)

Acute risk classify

97.7

--

--

1.00 (0.90-1.00)

0 (0 – 0.95)

0.98 (0.86-1.00)

Clinical diagnoses of foot disease

   

Ulcer type: neuropathic

83.7

0.55 (0.14)

Moderate

1.00 (0.86-1.00)

0.46 (0.20-0.74)

0.81 (0.64-0.91)

(Neuropathic or neuroisch.)

Ulcer type is ischaemic

79.1

0.57 (0.13)

Moderate

0.74 (0.48-0.90)

0.83 (0.62-0.95)

0.78 (0.52-0.93)

(Neuroisch. or ischaemic)

Combined surface area mm2#

 

0.99 (0.99–1.00)

Strong

   

Any clinical infection

81.4

0.58 (0.13)

Moderate

0.71 (0.42-0.90)

0.86 (0.67-0.95)

0.71 (0.42-0.90)

UTWCS (Grade 1A)

81.4

0.61 (0.12)

Substantial

0.86 (0.56-0.97)

0.79 (0.60-0.91)

0.69 (0.41-0.86)

Deep ulcer

93.0

0.73 (0.15)

Substantial

0.71 (0.30-0.95)

0.97 (0.84-1.00)

0.83 (0.36-0.99)

(Grade 2 or 3)^

Clinical management principles performed

   

Ulcer debridement is required

95.3

0.39 (0.22)

Fair

1.00 (0.89-1.00)

0.50 (0.03-0.97)

0.98 (0.86-1.00)

Dressing is optimum

97.7

--

--

0.98 (0.86-1.00)

--

1.00 (0.90-1.00)

Antibiotics are required

90.7

0.76 (0.11)

Substantial

0.75 (0.43-0.93)

0.97 (0.81-1.00)

0.90 (0.54-0.99)

Off-loading is optimum

79.1

0.50 (0.14)

Moderate

0.80 (0.44-0.96)

0.79 (0.60-0.90)

0.53 (0.27-0.78)

Footwear is optimum

79.1

0.47 (0.15)

Moderate

0.70 (0.35-0.92)

0.82 (0.64-0.92)

0.54 (0.26-0.80)

Educated patient

100

--

--

1.00 (0.90-1.00)

--

1.00 (0.90-1.00)

  1. K = Kappa; (SE) = Standard Error; % = Percentage agreement; PPV = Positive Predictive Value.
  2. -- = Measure of agreement was unable to be calculated because at least one variable was a constant.
  3. GP = General Practitioner; CVD = Cardiovascular Disease; ESRF = End Stage Renal Failure; PAD = Peripheral Arterial Disease; UTWCS = University of Texas Wound Classification System.
  4. *= Weighted Kappa used for ordinal data.
  5. # = Intraclass correlation (ICC) (Standard Deviation (SD)) for continuous data.
  6. ^ = Depth was determined from the UTWCS score.