Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Reliability and concurrent validity of a novel method allowing for in-shoe measurement of navicular drop

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Aug 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George S Murley
12 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Mathieson
23 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martijn Steultjens
28 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Michael Skovdal Rathleff
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Mathieson
3 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George S Murley
9 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martijn Steultjens
19 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Michael Skovdal Rathleff
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Michael Skovdal Rathleff
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
10 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
13 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-7-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement