From: A review of the foot function index and the foot function index – revised
Instrument | 1stAuthor | Objective | Population (N, Sex, Age, Dx, location) | Analysis | Items/Domains/Subscales | Response type | Summary evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foot Function Index (FFI), 2000 | Lin, S [39] | Validation of AOFAS forefoot outcomes of arthrodesis surgery | N: 16 Mean age: 44 (SD=13.96) 8 male | Pre-post surgery | FFI | VAS | Both FFI and AOFAS scores were improved at post surgery. |
Dx: Tarsometatarso injury/degenerative arthritis | Follow-up 36 months (24–65 months) | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Location: USA | FFI and AOFAS were applied at pre-surgery and at follow up | 3 domains | |||||
FFI, 2002 | Watson, TS [61] | Validation with VAS pain scale with SF-36 short form in plantar fasciotomy | Group I N (control): 75 Mean age: 46 (range: 20–78) 14 male | Retrospective observational Follow up duration 26.4 months | FFI | VAS | FFI scores were improved. |
Group II N (surgery): 46 Mean age: 46 (Range: 25–78) 9 male | Group II filled out FFI and SF-26 at post-surgery only | 23 items | FFI scores reflected activities of daily living. SF-36 s cores reflection satisfaction of physical and role model. | ||||
Dx: Sub-Calcaneal pain syndrome | Validation with VAS pain scale SF-36 short form | 3 domains | Conclusion: useful. | ||||
Location: USA | |||||||
FFI, 2003 | Mulcahy, D [56] | Surgery-Reconstruction of the forefoot; FFI scores were used to test if there was correlation with WOMAC, AOFAS HMIP, and AOFAS LMIP. | N: 79 14 male Mean age: 59 (Range: 24–80) | Retrospective observational; Follow up 6yrs.+3 mo (6mo-19 years) | FFI; 23 items; 3 domains | VAS | FFI pain subscale was used to monitor pain in both groups. |
Dx: RA forefoot deformity | Conclusion: useful | ||||||
Mean age of surgery: 52 years (range: 23–79) | |||||||
Group 1 stable 1st ray. (no surgery) | |||||||
Group 2: 1st ray surgery | |||||||
Location: Canada | |||||||
FFI, 2004 | Ibrahim T [48] | Surgery- MTP joint replacement; Validation of AOFAS Hallux scale scores with FFI scores from those who did not have surgery and those who had surgery | N: 8, 1 male | Retrospective observational; Follow up for 17 months | FFI | VAS | Correlation observed between the scores of AOFAS and FFI |
Mean age: 58 (Range: 51–80) | 23 items | Note: AOFAS Hallux scale had not been validated. | |||||
Dx. Hallux rigidus | 3 domains | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Location: UK | |||||||
FFI, 2004 | Vallier, HA [52] | Surgery-Open reduction internal fixation; Correlation of FFI and musculoskeletal function assessment (MFA) | N: 100 60 male | Retrospective observational | FFI | VAS | Scores of FFI and MFA were correlated |
Mean age: 32.6 (Range: 13–77) | Follow up 36 months (12–74 months) | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Dx: Talar neck fracture | FFI was applied to N=59 at follow-up | 3 domains | |||||
Location: USA | |||||||
FFI, 2005 | Taranow, WS [49] | Surgery- metalic hemiarthroplasty: Do FFI scores improve at post-operation | N: 28 17 male | Retrospective observational case review | FFI | VAS | FFI scores from pre to post operation showed significant improvement. |
Mean age: 52.9 (Range: 38–71) | Follow 33.4 months | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | ||||
(3–mo-111mo) | |||||||
Dx: Hallux rigidus | 3 domains | ||||||
Location: USA | |||||||
FFI, 2005 | Grondal, L [40] | Surgery-Athrodesis vs. Mayo resection of MTP; FFI scores as outcomes | N: 31; 26 male | RCT not-blinded, ANOVA and multiple comparisons | FFI | VAS | FFI scores at post-surgery within groups were improved and there no significant differences between the groups. |
Mean age: 54 yrs | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
(Range: 33–77) | |||||||
Resection N=: 16 | 3 domains | ||||||
Fusion N=: 15 | |||||||
Dx: RA painful forefoot deformity | |||||||
Location: Sweden | |||||||
FFI, 2005 | Daniels, TR [62] | Surgery -Free tibular graft; FFI scores were validated with MODEMS and SF-36 short form | N: 28, 13 male | Observational | FFI 21 items (2 items about orthoses were not applicable) 3 domains | Likert | The scores of FFI, SF-36 and MODEMS were demonstrating similar improved outcomes at post-surgery |
Mean age: 52 (Range: 22–76) | Follow-up: 36 months (26–52 months) | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Dx: Vascularized fibular bone graft | FFI was applied at pre-surgery and at 6 and between 26–54 month post surgery | ||||||
Location: Canada | |||||||
FFI, 2005 | Lee, S [63] | Surgery -Isolated sesamoidectomy; FFI disability sub-scale validated with VAS pain scale and SF-36 short form | N; 32; 8 male | Retrospective observational | FFI 9 items | VAS | The scores of FFI disability and VAS pain sub-scales were correlated.Conclusion: useful |
Mean age: 37.2 (Range: 18–65) | 62 month | 1 domain: disability scale | |||||
Post-op N=: 20 | |||||||
Dx: Hallux alignment | |||||||
Location: USA | |||||||
FFI, 2006 | SooHoo, NF [64] | Surgery- Any type of foot and ankle surgery; Validating AOFAS, SF-36 and measuring Standard Response Mean (SRM) and effect size (ES) | N: 25; 6 Male | Pre-post surgery FFI was applied at pre-surgery and 6 months post-surgery | FFI | VAS | Of the instruments used, scores of the pain subscale was the only measure reflecting high SRM (−0.83) and ES (−0.86). Therefore, pain is the most important outcome in studies regarding chronic foot and ankle pain. |
Mean age: 40 (Range: 21–69) | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Dx: Chronic foot and ankle conditions requiring surgery | 3 domains | ||||||
Location: USA | |||||||
FFI, 2006 | Van der Krans, A [41] | Surgery- Calcaneal Cuboid arthrodesis; Correlation with AOFAS clinical rating index (CRI) of the hind foot | N: 20; 4 Male | Pre-post surgery | FFI-Dutch 15 items | 5-point verbal scale | FFI and CRI scores showed significant improvements |
Mean age: 55 (Range: 30–66) | Follow-up 25 months (13–39 months) | Pain and function subscales | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Dx: Flat foot | FFI was applied at pre-surgery and ad follow-up | ||||||
Location: Netherlands | |||||||
FFI, 2006 | Harris, M [53] | Surgery- High impact fracture repair; Correlation with Musculoskeletal function assessment (MFA) | N: 76; 45 Male | Pre-post surgery follow up 26 months (24–38 months). FFI was applied at pre-surgery, 6 and 12 weeks and at 6 months by mail, telephone, and was self-administered. | FFI | VAS | High FFI score occurred in those with the worse fractures and external fixation. This is also reflected in MFA scores. |
Mean age: 45 (Range: 17–81) | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Dx: distal tibial plafond fracture | 3 domains | ||||||
Location: USA | |||||||
FFI, 2006 | Stegman M [42] | Surgery-Triple arthrodesis; Correlation with AOFAS hind foot scores | N: 81; 38 Male | Pre-post surgery | FFI Dutch | Likert | FFI-5pt and AOFAS hind foot scores improved 89%. However, patient did not perceive the benefit of the procedure. |
Mean age: 40.5 (Range: 14–79) | FFI applied at pre-surgery and 1 yr (1–4) post surgery | 15 items | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Dx: Hind foot disorders | 2 domains | ||||||
Location: Netherlands | |||||||
FFI, 2007 | Jung, HG [45] | Surgery-Fusion of tarso metatarso-joint; Correlation with SF-36, AOFAS | N: 67; 12 Male | Retrospective observational | FFI | VAS | Scores of the FFI, SF-36 AOFAS and VAS pain scale were markedly improved at post-surgery |
Mean age: 60.2 (Range: 35–84) | Follow for 40.6 months | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Dx: Non-traumatic osteoarthritis of the tarso-meta-tarso joints | FFI applied at post-surgery | 3 domains | |||||
Location: USA | |||||||
FFI, 2008 | Vesely, R [43] | Surgery – Tibio Calcaneal arthrodesis; Correlation with ankle-hind foot score | N: 20; 16 Male | Retrospective observational | FFI | VAS | The scores of FFI and ankle hind foot were improved. |
Mean age: 58.7 (Range: 23–72) | FFI applied at post-surgery, time unknown | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Dx: Traumatic arthritis of the ankles | Article in Czech with English abstract. | 3 domains | |||||
Location: Czech Republic | |||||||
FFI, 2008 | Stropek, S [37] | Surgery- arthroscopy | N: 26; 6 Male | Pre-post surgery observational | FFI | VAS | FFI pain scale scores were markedly improved at post surgery in 79% of the patients |
Age: male: 45; female: 49 | FFI applied at pre-surgery and at 3 month follow-up | Pain scale | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Dx: Calcaneal spur | 9 items | ||||||
Location: Czech Republic | |||||||
FFI, 2008 | Schutte, BG [50] | Surgery-Total ankle replacement; pain and function outcome measure | N: 47; 16 Males | Pre-post surgery | FFI-Dutch | Likert | Total scores improved at post–surgery |
Mean age: 57.1 (range 37–81) | FFI applied at pre-surgery and at follow up | 18 items | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Dx: Ankle joint deformity | Duration of follow up 28 months (range 12–67) | Pain and difficulty subscales | |||||
Location: Netherlands | |||||||
FFI, 2008 | Ward, CM [57] | Surgery-Reconstruction; Validation of SF 26 with FFI | N: 25; 14 Male | Pre-post surgery | FFI | VAS | At follow up the FFI scores were in the mid-range. The scores for smokers were worse than non-smokers, females were worse than males. FFI activity limitation and disability scores were correlated with SF-36 physical component scores. |
Mean age: 15 (Range: 8.7-25) | FFI applied at mean age of 41.5 years after 26.1 yrs follow-up | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Dx: Flexible Cavovarus Charcot Marie-Tooth | 3 domains | ||||||
Location: USA | |||||||
FFI, 2009 | Castellani, C [65] | Surgery-Fixation with cannulation osteosynthesis; Outcomes of an intervention | N: 21; 11 Male | Retrospective observational | FFI | VAS | At follow-up 3 of the 21 (14%) had poor FFI disability scores |
Dx: Transitional fracture of distal tibia | FFI was applied at 3.8 yrs after implants removal | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Age 13.7 (1.4) | 3 domains | ||||||
Location: Austria | |||||||
FFI, 2009 | Bonnin, MP [51] | Surgery – Total ankle arthoplasty; Correlations of FAAM (foot and ankle ability measure) | N: 140; 50 Male | Pre-post surgery pre at pre-surgery FAAM and FFI was applied, and also at 53.8 ±29 months (12–125) post- surgery | FFI | VAS | FFI pain scores were no different between OA and RA groups. The FFI scores were improved and were similar to that of FAAM. |
Mean age: 60.9 (Range: 26–90) | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Dx: OA: 100 RA: 40 | 3 domains | ||||||
Location: France | |||||||
FFI, 2009 | Potter, MQ [54] | Surgery- Intraarticular fracture of the Calcaneus; Correlation with AOFAS hind foot scores | N: 73; 52 Male | Retrospective observational FFI applied at follow up of 12.8 years (5–18.5) | FFI | VAS | Scored of FFI, AOFAS hind foot and Calcaneal scores were correlated. |
Dx: Calcaneal fracture | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Location: USA | 3 domains | ||||||
FFI, 2010 | Aurich, M [66] | Surgery-Arthroscopic chondrocyte implant; Correlation with AOFAS hind foot scores and Core Scale of the foot and ankle module of the Academy of Orthopedic Surgeon (AAOS) | N: 18; 13 Male | Retrospective observational FFI was applied at pre-arthroscopy and at follow-up, with mean duration of 19 months | FFI 18 items; Pain and function subscales | Likert | FFI scores improved comparable with those of AOFAS results and Core Scale scores |
Mean age: 29.2 (SD 10.2 years) | Limitation: Use of FFI measures with caution in individual whose. functional level is better than the level of activities of daily living. | ||||||
Dx: Osteochondral lesion of talus/tibia | Conclusion: useful | ||||||
Location:Australia | |||||||
FFI, 2010 | Van der Heide, HJL [59] | Surgery-Correction pes cavo varus; Validation AOFAS lesser toe module | N: 39; 6 Male | Pre-post surgery; FFI applied at pre-surgery and 40 month post-surgery | FFI-Dutch | VAS | FFI pain and function scores improved post-surgery |
Mean age: 59 (Range: 29–81) | Conclusion: useful | ||||||
Dx: RA lesser MTP | 23 items | ||||||
Location: Netherlands | 3domains | ||||||
FFI- Dutch, 2010 | Kroon, M [60] | Surgery-Correction pes cavo varus; Validation AOFAS hind foot scale | N: 15; 8 Male | Pre-post surgery FFI applied at pre and 50 month post surgery | FFI-Dutch | Likert | Pain and function scores improved post surgery |
Mean age:40 (SD 14) | 18 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Dx: Cavo varus foot deformity | Pain and function subscales | ||||||
Location: The Netherlands | |||||||
FFI, 2010 | Van Doeselaar, DJ [46] | Surgery-Fusion of MTP; Correlation with VAS pain and satisfaction | N: 62 | Pre-post surgery; FFI applied at pre-surgery and 12 month post-surgery | FFI Dutch; 18 items | Likert | FFI-5 pts scores were improved. |
2 groups | |||||||
Dx: H rigidus; N: 27; 9 Male | Conclusion: useful | ||||||
Mean age: 58 (Range: 42–72) | |||||||
Dx: H valgus; N: 35; 6 Male | |||||||
Mean age: 61 (Range: 37–76) | |||||||
Location: Netherlands | |||||||
FFI, 2010 | Doets, HC [44] | Surgery-Salvage arthrodesis for failed TAA; Correlating with AOFAS and VAS pain scale | N: 18; 4 Male | Retrospective observational FFI applied at follow up, 3–12 years | FFI-Dutch | 5 point rating scale | FFI scores improved similar to that of AOFAS, VAS pain, disability and satisfaction measure |
Mean age: 55 (Range: 27–76) | 15 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Dx: Failed TAA | Pain and function subscales | ||||||
Location: Netherlands | |||||||
FFI, 2010 | Niki, H [47] | Surgery-TMT fusion and osteotomy; Concurrent assessment of FFI and SF-36 and Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot and Ankle Score | N: 30; 1 Male | Pre-post surgery FFI was applied at pre-surgery and at 36 mos follow-up | FFI | VAS | The scores of all instruments were improved at post-surgery. |
Mean age: 53.6 (Range: 45–67) | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Dx: RA fore-foot deformity | 3 domains | ||||||
Location: Japan | |||||||
FFI, 2010 | Schlegel, UJ [58] | Surgery-Club foot correctional; Post-surgery foot health assessment | N: 98; 72 Male | Retrospective observational FFI was applied at 8.2 years (0–11.2); Post surgery N: 46 (50%) | FFI | VAS | FFI scores indicated good foot health. |
Mean follow-up: 4.5M (Range: 1–68) | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Dx: Club foot | 3 domains | ||||||
Location: Germany | |||||||
FFI, 2010 | Gaskill, T [55] | Surgery- Internal fixation of the instraarticular Calcaneal fracture; Concurrent evaluation with OAFAS hind foot | N: 146; 99 Male | Retrospective observational FFI was applied at post-surgery 8.98 years | FFI | VAS | FFI scores of Group 1 were better than Group 2 at post surgery. |
Group 1 <50 yrs; N: 99; 65 male | 23 items | Conclusion: useful | |||||
Mean age: 36 (Age range) | 3 domains | ||||||
Group 2 >50 years; N: 47; 33 male | |||||||
Mean age: 58 (Range: 50–84) | |||||||
Dx: Calcaneal fracture | |||||||
Location: USA | |||||||
FFI, 2010 | Eberl, R [67] | Surgery- Various surgical techniques were applied; Post surgery outcomes | N: 24; 18 Male | Retrospective observational | FFI | VAS | FFI scores improved in both groups. Group 1 scored better than Group 2. |
Mean age: 13.2 (Range: 5–17 yrs) | Follow-up 3.2 years (7 months-8.2 years) | 23 items | Limitation: The author stated that use of self-report in instrument in children may result in spurious outcomes, due to their pronounced potential for compensation. | ||||
Group 1 <12 years; N: 9; Age : 9.2 | FFI applied at follow up | 3 domains | Conclusion: useful | ||||
Group 2 >12 years; N: 15; Age: 14.6 | |||||||
Dx: Complex ankle injuries | |||||||
Location: Australia |