Peer Review reports
From: Reliability of clinically relevant 3D foot bone angles from quantitative computed tomography
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ward Glasoe |
27 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kazuomi Sugamoto |
10 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Parr |
11 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Nester |
24 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - David Gutekunst |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
30 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ward Glasoe |
11 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Parr |
9 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - David Gutekunst |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
10 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Sep 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1757-1146-6-38 |
You can find further information about peer review here.