Skip to main content

Table 7 Mean values (SD) and percentage change for the medial and lateral midfoot at week 4 (N = 30)

From: The effect of customised and sham foot orthoses on plantar pressures

Medial midfoot

 

Peak pressure (kPa)

Maximum force (%BW)

Contact area (cm2)

Insert

Mean (SD)

% change

p-value

Mean (SD)

% change

p-value

Mean (SD)

% change

p-value

Shoe only (control)

106.5 (30.9)

n/a

n/a

8.2 (7.9)#

n/a

n/a

14.4 (7.1)

n/a

n/a

Customised foot orthosis

119.3 (32.1)

+12%*†+^

0.040

14.9 (7.5)#

+81%*†+^

<0.001

23.3 (3.9)

+62%*†+^

<0.001

Contoured polyethylene

102.5 (30.7)

−4%#

1.000

9.0 (8.4)#

+10%#†+

0.354

16.1 (7.5)

+11%#†+

0.486

Contoured EVA

104.5 (29.0)

−2%#

1.000

12.3 (7.8)#

+49%*#^

<0.001

20.6 (6.2)

+43%*#^

<0.001

Flat EVA

106.5 (29.6)

0%#

1.000

12.2 (7.7)#

+48%*#^

<0.001

20.5 (6.1)

+42%*#^

<0.001

Lateral midfoot

 

Peak pressure (kPa)

Maximum force (%BW)

Contact area (cm 2 )

Insert

Mean (SD)

% change

p -value

Mean (SD)

% change

p -value

Mean (SD)

% change

p -value

Shoe only (control)

125.6 (33.9)

n/a

n/a

21.5 (5.4)

n/a

n/a

23.5 (2.4)

n/a

n/a

Customised foot orthosis

131.4 (30.3)

+5%†+

1.000

25.4 (5.4)

+18%*†+^

<0.001

24.1 (2.0)

+3%^

0.131

Contoured polyethylene

125.4 (29.5)

0%

1.000

23.4 (5.4)

+9%*#

0.001

23.6 (2.3)

+1%#

1.000

Contoured EVA

119.2 (26.0)

−5%#

0.930

23.7 (4.7)

+10%*#

0.002

24.1 (2.2)

+2%

0.305

Flat EVA

120.6 (30.8)

−4%#

0.909

24.1 (5.3)

+12%*#

<0.001

24.1 (2.2)

+3%

0.216

  1. # Data transformed prior to determining significance.
  2. * Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the shoe only condition.
  3. # Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the customised orthosis.
  4. † Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the flat EVA sham orthosis.
  5. + Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the contoured EVA sham orthosis.
  6. ^ Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the contoured polyethylene orthosis.