Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean values (SD) and percentage change for the medial and lateral midfoot at week 0 (N = 30)

From: The effect of customised and sham foot orthoses on plantar pressures

Medial midfoot

 

Peak pressure (kPa)

Maximum force (%BW)

Contact area (cm2)

Insert

Mean (SD)

% change

p-value

Mean (SD)

% change

p-value

Mean (SD)

% change

p-value

Shoe only (control)

104.2 (32.1)

n/a

n/a

8.1 (8.0)#

n/a

n/a

14.2 (7.1)

n/a

n/a

Customised foot orthosis

119.7 (33.3)

+15%*†+

0.017

15.0 (7.6)#

+86%*†+^

<0.001

23.3 (3.5)

+65%*†+^

<0.001

Contoured polyethylene

98.2 (28.8)

−6%#

1.000

8.3 (8.0)#

+3%#†+

1.000

15.7 (7.6)

+11%#†+

0.054

Contoured EVA

101.6 (26.0)

−2%#

1.000

11.4 (8.1)#

+42%*#^

<0.001

19.3 (6.6)

+36%*#^

<0.001

Flat EVA

104.3 (26.6)

0%#

1.000

12.0 (7.9)#

+49%*#^

<0.001

20.0 (6.5)

+41%*#^

<0.001

Lateral midfoot

 

Peak pressure (kPa)

Maximum force (%BW)

Contact area (cm 2 )

Insert

Mean (SD)

% change

p -value

Mean (SD)

% change

p -value

Mean (SD)

% change

p -value

Shoe only (control)

121.7 (29.8)

n/a

n/a

20.8 (5.4)

n/a

n/a

23.5 (2.6)

n/a

n/a

Customised foot orthosis

126.0 (26.3)

+4%

1.000

25.4 (5.7)

+22%*+^

<0.001

24.0 (2.1)

+2%^

0.166

Contoured polyethylene

121.3 (23.5)

0%

1.000

22.4 (5.6)

+8%*#†

0.023

23.5 (2.4)

0%#†+

1.000

Contoured EVA

118.3 (23.7)

−3%

1.000

23.7 (4.5)

+14%*#

<0.001

24.0 (2.0)

+2%^

0.441

Flat EVA

115.0 (22.5)

−5%#

0.090

23.9 (4.5)

+15%*^

<0.001

24.0 (2.1)

+2%^

0.524

  1. # Data transformed prior to determining significance.
  2. * Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the shoe only condition.
  3. # Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the customised orthosis.
  4. † Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the flat EVA sham orthosis.
  5. + Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the contoured EVA sham orthosis.
  6. ^ Mean difference significant at the 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjusted) compared to the contoured polyethylene orthosis.