Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of shoe-length fit between people with and without diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a case–control study

  • Alistair D McInnes1,
  • Farina Hashmi1,
  • Lisa J Farndon2,
  • Amanda Church1,
  • Maria Haley2,
  • Debora M Sanger2 and
  • Wesley Vernon2Email author
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20125:9

Received: 26 July 2011

Accepted: 16 April 2012

Published: 16 April 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
26 Jul 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Mathieson
13 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Virginia Bower
30 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lisa Farndon
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
16 Apr 2012 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-5-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Podiatry, School of Health Professions, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK
Primary and Community Care Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK