Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Classification of the height and flexibility of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George S Murley
13 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Mathieson
21 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - RobRoy Martin
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mette Kjaergaard Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mette Kjaergaard Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George S Murley
7 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Mathieson
8 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - RobRoy Martin
8 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mette Kjaergaard Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mette Kjaergaard Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
17 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
17 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-5-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement