From: Importance and challenges of measuring intrinsic foot muscle strength
Method | Test | Paper | Participant | Parameter | Reliability | Comment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  |  | Statistic | Intrarater | Interrater |  | ||
 |  |  |  |  |  | Within session | Between session | Hallux toe | Lesser toes |  |
Indirect | US (Chison 8300 Deluxe Digital System-Portable Model) | Hing et al. (2009) [61] | Healthy Asymptomatic participants | Dorsoplantar thickness of AbdH | ICC | 0.979(95% CI 0.99-0.99) | 0.96 (95%CI 0.93-0.97) | Â | Â | Â |
Age 28.24 ±10.2 year | ||||||||||
Sex M & F n=30 | ||||||||||
Medio-lat width of AbdH | ICC | 0.95 (95%CI 0.92-0.97) | 0.88 (95%CI 0.80-0.93) | Â | Â | Â | ||||
CSA | ICC | 0.99 (95%CI 0.98-0.99) | 0.78 (95%CI 0.64-0.87) | Â | Â | Â | ||||
 | US (Philips HDII-High end model) | Cameron et al. (2008) [70] | Healthy Asymptomatic participants | Dorso-plantar thickness of AbdH | ICC | 0.97(95% CI 0.98-0.99) | 0.97(95%CI 0.93-0.98) |  |  |  |
Age 28.24 ± 10.2 year | ||||||||||
Sex M & F n=30 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | |||
 |  |  |  | Medio-lat width of AbdH | ICC | 0.97(95% CI 0.92-0.97) | 0.94 (95%CI 0.90-0.96) |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  | CSA | ICC | 0.98 (95%CI 0.98-0.979) | 0.79 (95%CI 0.65-0.88) |  |  |  |