Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
| 1 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Byron Perrin |
| 15 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magnus Löndahl |
| 14 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Christopher Scanlon |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
| 1 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Byron Perrin |
| 5 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magnus Löndahl |
| 3 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Christopher Scanlon |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 11 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Byron Perrin |
| 16 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Christopher Scanlon |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 29 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Christopher Scanlon |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 29 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1757-1146-5-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.