Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Natalie Collins |
16 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fiona Hawke |
6 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Marike van der Leeden |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fiona Hawke |
21 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Natalie Collins |
27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marike van der Leeden |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marike van der Leeden |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
9 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marike van der Leeden |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
10 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1757-1146-4-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.