Skip to main content

Table 2 Sample sizes and population characteristics from each included study

From: Lower limb biomechanics during running in individuals with achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review

Study

Symptomatic

(yes/no)

Sample size (limbs)

Gender (n)

(Male/Female)

Mean age ± SD

(range) (years)

Mass (kg), height (cm),

BMI

Experience: years of

sporting activity

  

AT

C

AT

C

AT

C

AT

C

AT

C

Azevedo et al. [27]

Yes

21

21

16/5

16/5

41.8 ± 9.7 (NR)

38.9 ± 10.1 (NR)

77.6, 177.8, NR

70.2, 174.3, NR

> 3 years*

 

Baur et al. [11]

Yes

16

28

NR

NR

36 ± 9 (NR)*

73, 179, NR*

NR 'experienced'*

Donoghue et al. [33]

No

12

12

11/1

11/1

38.7 ± 8.1 (NR)

44.3 ± 8.4 (NR)

73.3, 175, NR

79.3, 178, NR

NR

NR

Donoghue et al. [34]

No

11

11

10/1

10/1

39.6 ± 7.7 (NR)

45.2 ± 8.1 (NR)

71.9, 174, NR

77.9, 177, NR

NR

NR

Kaufman et al. [19]

No

17

299

17/0

299/0

22.5 ± 2.5 (NR)*

78.0, 177.0, NR*

2-7 times/week fitness

preparation, 73% reported

having run or jogged on a

regular basis for a period of 3

or more months before

reporting to training*

McCrory et al. [25]

Yes

31

58

NR

NR

38.4 ± 1.8 (NR)

34.5 ± 1.2 (NR)

71.4, 174.5, NR

70.0, 174.5, NR

11.9 ± 1.4

9.6 ± 0.8

Ryan et al. [35]

Yes

27

21

NR

NR

40 ± 7 (NR)

40 ± 9 (NR)

78, 181, NR

71, 177, NR

NR

NR

Van Ginckel et al. [2]

No

10

53

2/8

8/45

38.0 ± 11.35 (NR)

40.0 ± 9.00 (NR)

69.8, 167.1, 24.95

70.0, 168.3, 24.69

0

0

Williams et al. [24]

No

8

8

6/2

5/3

36.0 ± 8.2 (NR)

31.8 ± 9.3 (NR)

67.3, 176, NR

65.6, 170, NR

19.1 ± 7.7

11.0 ± 9.1

  1. Abbreviations:
  2. AT, Achilles tendinopathy group; C, control group; NR, not reported; *, Specified total group characteristics only