Table 4 Waist girth correlated significantly with weight (r = 0.938; p < 0.01) and also height (r = 0.664; p < 0.01). Waist girth and foot posture correlations were weak and inverse viz. FPI (L) r = -0.213 (p < 0.05), FPI(R) r = -0.228 (p < 0.01).
| Â | Â | FPILTS | Height | Weight | BMI | Waist | FPIRT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPILTS | Pearson Correlation | 1 | -.037 | -.186(*) | -.243(**) | -.213(*) | .759(** |
| Â | Sig. (2-tailed) | Â | .665 | .028 | .004 | .011 | .000 |
Height | Pearson Correlation | -.037 | 1 | .759(**) | .458(**) | .664(**) | -.017 |
| Â | Sig. (2-tailed) | .665 | Â | .000 | .000 | .000 | .844 |
Weight | Pearson Correlation | -.186(*) | .759(**) | 1 | .909(**) | .938(**) | -.194(*) |
| Â | Sig. (2-tailed) | .028 | .000 | Â | .000 | .000 | .021 |
BMI | Pearson Correlation | -.243(**) | .458(**) | .909(**) | 1 | .912(**) | -.263(**) |
| Â | Sig. (2-tailed) | .004 | .000 | .000 | Â | .000 | .002 |
Waist | Pearson Correlation | -.213(*) | .664(**) | .938(**) | .912(**) | 1 | -.228(**) |
| Â | Sig. (2-tailed) | .011 | .000 | .000 | .000 | Â | .007 |
FPIRTS | Pearson Correlation | .759(**) | -.017 | -.194(*) | -.263(**) | -.228(**) | 1 |
| Â | Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | .844 | .021 | .002 | .007 | Â |