- Oral presentation
- Open Access
18 month audit of anesthetist led sedation vs podiatric ankle and poplitieal blocks: review of protocols, procedures and patient perceptions
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research volume 3, Article number: O4 (2010)
A review of 100 patients between January 2009 - June 2010 undergoing foot surgery requiring an ankle or popliteal block were assessed on their personal perceptions of the injection procedure in terms of expectations of pain and intra-surgical experience. Comparative results are made with those who had anaesthetist led sedation and an ankle block only. Preliminary results indicate those patients selected/elected for the local anaesthetic had a favourable experience, the majority would be happy to repeat their procedure under similar conditions. Sedation patients had a very similar patient experience profile. This small study supports the view that good practice for Podiatric Surgical patients is to offer an anaesthetist led sedation or general anaesthesia option but it is not essential or desirable for all patients.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Beech, I. 18 month audit of anesthetist led sedation vs podiatric ankle and poplitieal blocks: review of protocols, procedures and patient perceptions. J Foot Ankle Res 3 (Suppl 1), O4 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-S1-O4
- Public Health
- General Anaesthesia
- Comparative Result
- Similar Condition
- Local Anaesthetic