Minimal Important Difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Jul 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne-Maree Keenan|
|3 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Bennett|
|11 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Karl Landorf|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 May 2010||Editorially accepted|
|14 May 2010||Article published||10.1186/1757-1146-3-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.