Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Minimal Important Difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Maree Keenan
3 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Bennett
11 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Karl Landorf
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 May 2010 Editorially accepted
14 May 2010 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-3-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.