Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Quentin A. Fogg |
2 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Pickard |
13 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jackie Locke |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
29 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Quentin A. Fogg |
18 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Pickard |
15 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jackie Locke |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jackie Locke |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
1 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jackie Locke |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
13 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jackie Locke |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
13 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
22 Dec 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Dec 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1757-1146-3-32 |
You can find further information about peer review here.