Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Diagnostic accuracy of existing methods for identifying diabetic foot ulcers from inpatient and outpatient datasets

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alistair McInnes
9 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Claire Spruce
16 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Min-Woong Sohn
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Min-Woong Sohn
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Min-Woong Sohn
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Min-Woong Sohn
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Min-Woong Sohn
Resubmission - Version 7
23 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
24 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
24 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-3-27

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement