Table 2 Selected results from studies using 3D scanners to measure anthropometric changes in the foot under weight bearing conditions.
From: The use of 3D surface scanning for the measurement and assessment of the human foot
| Â | Â | Percentage change in parameter | Â | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foot shape parameter | Load | Houston et al (40 feet) [38] | Tsung et al (16 feet) [39] | Xiong et al (60 feet) [40] | Mean |
Length | HWB | +1.7% | +2.7% | +1.1% (M 1.1%, F1.1%) | +1.53% |
| Â | FWB | +2.2% | +3.4% | +1.4% (M1.3%; F1.5%) | +1.95% |
Ball width | HWB | +3.8% | +2.9% | +2.2% (M2.6%; F 1.7%) | +2.85% |
| Â | FWB | +4.3% | +6% | +2.6% (M3.1%; F2%) | +3.66% |
Heel width | HWB | +4.8% | +5.9% | +1.1% (M1.4%; F0.8%) | +3.04% |
| Â | FWB | +4.8% | +8.7% | +1.6% (M1.8%; F1.3%) | +3.68% |