Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A case-series study to explore the efficacy of foot orthoses in treating first metatarsophalangeal joint pain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Nov 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shannon Munteanu
17 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keith Rome
30 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Brian Welsh
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keith Rome
7 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shannon Munteanu
8 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Brian Welsh
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Brian Welsh
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Brian Welsh
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Brian Welsh
Resubmission - Version 7
23 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
27 Aug 2010 Editorially accepted
27 Aug 2010 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-3-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement