Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Individual subject rankings based on AHI during 50% WB.

From: A comparison of foot arch measurement reliability using both digital photography and calliper methods

Subject AHIMS Digital Photo Rank Difference
  AHI Value Rank AHI Value Rank  
D 0.309 1 0.353 1 0
J 0.309 2 0.363 4 -2
P 0.310 3 0.380 5 -2
O 0.318 4 0.320 2 2
S 0.322 5 0.401 3 2
L 0.328 6 0.359 7 -1
B 0.330 7 0.384 8 -1
H 0.337 8 0.335 6 2
A 0.339 9 0.379 11 -2
C 0.340 10 0.333 15 -5
F 0.344 11 0.397 10 1
N 0.347 12 0.349 9 3
I 0.354 13 0.389 14 -1
R 0.361 14 0.356 12 2
E 0.365 15 0.323 20 -5
T 0.371 16 0.335 16 0
K 0.372 17 0.378 19 -2
Q 0.378 18 0.372 13 5
G 0.379 19 0.330 17 2
M 0.382 20 0.383 18 2
  1. Subjects are listed sequentially from lowest to highest values of AHI as measured using the AHIMS. The numerical rank of each subjects' AHI is also listed for the digital photographic method alongside the AHIMS rank. The rank difference was calculated the digital photographic rank subtracted from the AHIMS rank.