Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Reliability of the TekScan MatScan®system for the measurement of plantar forces and pressures during barefoot level walking in healthy adults

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Potter
17 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Warner
1 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Urry
8 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Zammit
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Zammit
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Zammit
Resubmission - Version 4
6 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Warner
27 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Potter
1 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Urry
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Zammit
Resubmission - Version 7
10 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
18 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
18 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-3-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement