Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Non- medical prescribing in Australasia and the UK: the case of podiatry

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wesley Vernon
29 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Gilheany
1 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Short
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Short
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Short
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Short
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
3 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Short
Resubmission - Version 9
3 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
5 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
5 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-3-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement