Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Arch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Apr 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
16 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dale Schuit
26 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shannon Munteanu
17 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - Thomas McPoil
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jun 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dale Schuit
25 Jun 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shannon Munteanu
8 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Thomas McPoil
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shannon Munteanu
10 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Thomas McPoil
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Thomas McPoil
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Jul 2008 Editorially accepted
28 Jul 2008 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-1-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement