Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of included articles (adapted from Downs & Black [49])

From: Effect of foot orthoses on lower extremity kinetics during running: a systematic literature review

 

Reference:

[51]

[52]

[58]

[53]

[54]

[60]

[55]

[59]

[56]

[57]

1

Is the hypothesis/aim of the study clearly described ?

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

Are the main outcomes to be measured clearly described in the Introduction or Methods section ?

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

Are the characteristics of the patients included in the study clearly described ?

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

4

Are the interventions of interest clearly described ?

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

5

Are the main findings of the study clearly described ?

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

6

Does the study provide estimates of the random variability in the data for the main outcomes ?

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

Have actual probability values been reported (e.g. 0.035 rather than <0.05) for the main outcomes except where the probability value is less than 0.001 ?

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

8

Were the subjects asked to participate in the study representative of the entire population from which they were recruited ?

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

9

Were those subjects who were prepared to participate representative of the entire population from which they were recruited ?

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

10

Was an attempt made to blind study subjects to the intervention they have received ?

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

11

Was an attempt made to blind those measuring the main outcomes of the intervention ?

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

12

If any of the results of the study were based on "data dredging", was this made clear ?

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

13

Were the statistical tests used to assess the main outcomes appropriate ?

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

14

Were the main outcome measures used accurate (valid and reliable) ?

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

15

Were study subjects randomised to intervention groups ?

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

1

 

Quality Index Score (max score = 15)

10

8

10

11

10

6

11

9

11

10

 

Quality Index %

67

53

67

73

67

40

73

60

73

67

  1. (0 = no/unable to determine, 1 = yes)