Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Ultrasound evaluation of the abductor hallucis muscle: Reliability study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 May 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - Wayne Hing
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Jun 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Scott Wearing
1 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Bowen
16 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Wayne Hing
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Scott Wearing
31 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Bowen
9 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Wayne Hing
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Wayne Hing
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
25 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Wayne Hing
Resubmission - Version 7
25 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
25 Sep 2008 Editorially accepted
25 Sep 2008 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-1-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement