Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function

  • Hannah L. Jarvis1, 2Email author,
  • Christopher J. Nester1,
  • Peter D. Bowden1 and
  • Richard K. Jones1
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research201710:7

DOI: 10.1186/s13047-017-0189-2

Received: 12 August 2016

Accepted: 26 January 2017

Published: 3 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Maree Keenan
28 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom McPoil
1 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Burns
14 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hannah Jarvis
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Maree Keenan
16 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom McPoil
17 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Burns
5 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hannah Jarvis
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Maree Keenan
16 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hannah Jarvis
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
3 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13047-017-0189-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Health Sciences, University of Salford
(2)
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Manchester Metropolitan University

Advertisement