Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of study characteristics

From: Dynamic foot function as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review

 

Population

Observation period (activity, duration)

Injury outcome

Injured group

Uninjured group

Gait assessment

Foot function measure

N total (n females)

Age (mean ± SD)

N total (n females)

Age (mean ± SD)

Hesar et al., [38]

Athletics club members

3 running sessions/week; 10 weeks

LL overuse injury

27 (22)

41 ± 8

104 (89)

39 ± 11

Barefoot; 15 m runway; self-selected running speed

Plantar loading (Footscan)

Hetsroni et al., [27]

Military personal

4 month basic training course

Patellofemoral pain

NR

NR

NR

NR

Barefoot; treadmill running at 5 km/hr

Rearfoot kinematics (Ariel Dynamics Inc.)

Hetsroni et al., [39]

Military personal

4 month basic training course

Tibial and femoral stress fractures

Dependent on outcome variable investigated

NR

Dependent on outcome variable investigated

NR

Barefoot; treadmill running at 5 km/hr

Rearfoot kinematics (Ariel Dynamics Inc.)

Kaufman et al., [29]

Military personal

25 week training course

LL overuse injury

Dependent on outcome variable investigated

NR

Dependent on outcome variable investigated

NR

Boots and barefoot; self-selected walking speed (no mean or range presented)

Plantar pressure ratios – dynamic arch index (<4.14 cavus, >8.10 planus)

Noehren et al., [40]

Female runners

Individual non-specified running programs over a 2 year period

Iliotibial band syndrome

18 (18)

26

Dependent on outcome variable investigated

28

‘Standard running shoe’; running along a 25 runway at a speed of 3.7 m/s

Rearfoot kinematics (Vicon)

Noehren et al., [46]

Female runners

Individual non-specified running programs over a 2 year period

Patellofemoral pain

15 (15)

27 ± 10

15 (15)

27 ± 10

‘Standard running shoe’ (Nike, Pegasus); running along a 25 run way at a speed of 3.7 m/s

Rearfoot kinematics (Vicon)

Sharma et al., [41]

Male infantry recruits

26 week military training

Medial tibial stress syndrome

37 (0)

NR

239 (0)

NR

Barefoot; self selected walking speed (no mean or range presented)

Plantar loading (Footscan)

Thijs et al., [42]

Novice recreational runners

10 week start to run programme

Patellofemoral pain

17 (16)

39 ± 10

85 (NR)

37 ± 9

Barefoot; walking at a self-chosen, moderate velocity (no mean or range presented)

Plantar loading (Footscan)

Thijs et al., [43]

Military personal

6 week basic military training

Patellofemoral pain

36 (19)

19 ± 2

48 (NR)

19 ± 1

Barefoot; walking at a self-chosen, moderate velocity (no mean or range presented)

Plantar loading (Footscan)

Van Ginckel et al., [44]

Novice runners

10 week start to run programme

Achilles tendinopathy

10 (2)

38 ± 11

53 (45)

40 ± 9

Barefoot; self-selected jogging pace (no mean or range presented)

Plantar loading (Footscan)

Willems et al., [35]

Physical education students

University physical education course

LL overuse injury

46 (29)

NR

167 (NR)

NR

Barefoot; 3.3 m/s within a boundary of 0.17 m/s

Plantar loading (Footscan)/ankle, knee and hip kinematics and kinetics (Proreflex)

Willems et al., [45]

Physical education students

University physical education course

LL overuse injury

46 (29)

NR

167 (NR)

NR

‘Neutral running shoe’; 3.3 m/s within a boundary of 0.17 m/s

Plantar loading (Footscan)/ankle, knee and hip kinematics and kinetics (Proreflex)

  1. LL = lower limb; NR = not reported.