Skip to main content

Table 4 Odds ratios for the association between a 1-standard deviation increase in leg lean mass and pronation or supination (Compared with referent), among men and women in the Framingham foot study, 2002-2008

From: The associations of leg lean mass with foot pain, posture and function in the Framingham foot study

 

Model 1a

Model 2b

Model 3c

 

Pronation vs. referent

 

Supination vs. referent

Pronation vs. referent

Supination vs. referent

Pronation vs. referent

Supination vs. referent

 

OR

95% CI

 

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

All participants

0.79

0.70, 0.88

 

1.16

1.04, 1.30

0.81

0.72, 0.91

1.23

1.09, 1.39

1.07

0.88, 1.29

1.01

0.84, 1.22

Men

0.98

0.81, 1.18

 

0.90

0.77, 1.06

0.92

0.74, 1.14

0.87

0.72, 1.05

    

Women

1.01

0.88, 1.17

 

1.06

0.90, 1.25

1.11

0.95, 1.30

1.17

0.98, 1.39

    
  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio.
  2. aUnadjusted.
  3. bAdjusted for age, body mass index.
  4. cAdjusted for age, body mass index, sex.
Back to article page

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

ISSN: 1757-1146