Table 3 ANOVA and Duncan’s MRT results among the four methods
From: Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement methods
Dimension | Foot length (mm) | Ball of foot length (mm) | Outside ball of foot length (mm) | Foot breadth diagonal (mm) | Foot breadth horizontal (mm) | Heel breadth (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  | Mean (SD) | Duncan’s MRT | Mean (SD) | Duncan’s MRT | Mean (SD) | Duncan’s MRT | Mean (SD) | Duncan’s MRT | Mean (SD) | Duncan’s MRT | Mean (SD) | Duncan’s MRT |
3D scanning | 249.3 (15.7) | A | 181.6 (11.6) | A | 164.1 (10.64) | A | 99.0 (7.3) | A | 97.1 (7.0) | A | 63.2 (4.5) | A |
Digital caliper | 247.7 (15.7) | A | 177.7 (12.7) | B | 157.0 (10.8) | B | 94.7 (7.2) | B | 85.2 (7.4) | B | 62.6 (4.0) | A |
Digital footprint | 233.0 (14.8) | B | 170.6 (10.9) | C | 153.4 (9.9) | C | 87.8 (6.4) | C | 86.0 (6.3) | B | 50.1 (3.8) | B |
Ink footprint | 234.1 (14.6) | B | 172.0 (10.6) | C | 147.7 (9.3) | D | 88.6 (6.5) | C | 85.1 (6.2) | B | 47.7 (3.9) | C |
p-value | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | ||||||