Cost-effectiveness of cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of plantar warts: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial (EVerT trial)
© Stamuli et al; BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 June 2011
Accepted: 27 February 2012
Published: 27 February 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terry Haines|
|15 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Kim Thomas|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Buchanan|
|11 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Kim Thomas|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terry Haines|
|15 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Buchanan|
|6 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kim Thomas|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|6 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Feb 2012||Editorially accepted|
|27 Feb 2012||Article published||10.1186/1757-1146-5-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.