Volume 4 Supplement 1

Proceedings of the Australasian Podiatry Council Conference 2011

Open Access

Application of a novel multi-segment foot model to assess foot function in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

  • Gordon J Hendry1Email author,
  • Janet Gardner-Medwin3,
  • Debbie E Turner2 and
  • Jim Woodburn2
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20114(Suppl 1):O20

DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-S1-O20

Published: 20 May 2011


Foot and ankle disease has been associated with impairments and disability in JIA, and altered gait patterns have been described. However, the extent to which disease-related foot impairments impact on localised biomechanical foot function remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical foot function between patients with JIA and healthy participants.


14 JIA patients with a history of foot disease and 10 healthy controls were recruited. Participants underwent 3D gait analysis, plantar foot pressure and spatio-temporal gait evaluation. Each participant completed the Juvenile Arthritis Foot Disability Index (JAFI) and CHAQ. US scores for effusions and synovial hypertrophy, tender/swollen foot joint counts, and deformity scores were recorded to assess localised disease activity and impairments. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the t distribution.


In the JIA group there were low but variable levels of localised disease activity indicated by low median (range) scores for tender [0 (0-4); 0 (0-5)], and swollen foot joints [0 (0-3); 0 (0-3)], US effusions [2 (0-6); 3 (0-7)] and synovitis [0 (0-3); 0 (0-2)]. Mild to moderate foot related impairments [JAFI; 1 (0-3)] and foot deformity scores [forefoot; 2 (0-7), 0.5 (0-5); rearfoot; 2.5 (1-5); 3.5 (2-5)] were observed. No significant differences were observed between group means for all core variables except right peak mid-foot dorsi-flexion [mean (95% CI) difference -3.04° (-5.79, -0.30)]. There were trends towards reduced walking velocity [mean difference 7.81cm/s (-8.26, 23.88)], greater variability in mid-foot contact area (cm2) [mean (SD) 19.77 (11.63); 19.04 (12.27) JIA group versus 19.31 (5.29), 19.01 (4.46) controls], and lower peak forefoot pressures (kPa) in the JIA group [mean difference 59.33 (-58.38, 177.03); 13.36 (-121.02, 147.73)].


At the group level, foot function appeared normal despite moderate levels of self reported impairment and disability in participants with JIA. At the individual level detailed changes in foot function relevant to flat-footedness or highly arched foot types were detected. Preliminary findings suggest that such foot types may be associated with abnormal foot segment rotations. Further study is required to evaluate foot biomechanics in clinically meaningful homogeneous subgroups of JIA patients.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney
Glasgow Caledonian University
University of Glasgow


© Hendry et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.