Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice

  • Babette C van der Zwaard1, 2,
  • Petra JM Elders1Email author,
  • Dirk L Knol3,
  • Kees J Gorter4,
  • Louis Peeraer2,
  • Daniëlle AWM van der Windt5 and
  • Henriëtte E van der Horst1
Contributed equally
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20114:11

DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-11

Received: 15 November 2010

Accepted: 31 March 2011

Published: 31 March 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anita Williams
23 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karl Landorf
4 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Babette Corine van der Zwaard
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anita Williams
28 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karl Landorf
7 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Babette Corine van der Zwaard
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Babette Corine van der Zwaard
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
31 Mar 2011 Editorially accepted
31 Mar 2011 Article published 10.1186/1757-1146-4-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Centre
(2)
Podiatry department, Fontys University for Applied Sciences
(3)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre
(4)
Department of General Practice, University Medical Centre Utrecht
(5)
Arthritis Research National Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University

Advertisement