From: Importance and challenges of measuring intrinsic foot muscle strength
Method | Test | Paper | Participant | Parameter | Reliability | Comment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  |  | Statistic | Intrarater | Interrater |  | ||
 |  |  |  |  |  | Within session | Between session | Hallux toe | Lesser toes |  |
Indirect | US | Mickle et al. (2012) [69] | Adults | AbdH CSA | ICC | n/a | 0.98 | n/a | n/a | Excellent |
Age 33.1 ± 11.2 year | AbdH Thickness | ICC | n/a | 0.98 | n/a | n/a | Excellent | |||
Sex M & F n=8 | FHB CSA | ICC | n/a | 0.83 | n/a | n/a | Excellent | |||
FHB Thickness | ICC | n/a | 0.94 | n/a | n/a | Excellent | ||||
FDB CSA | ICC | n/a | 0.99 | n/a | n/a | Excellent | ||||
FDB Thickness | ICC | n/a | 0.87 | n/a | n/a | Excellent | ||||
QP CSA | ICC | n/a | 0.99 | n/a | n/a | Excellent | ||||
QP Thickness | ICC | n/a | 0.95 | n/a | n/a | Excellent | ||||
AbdM CSA | ICC | n/a | 0.97 | n/a | n/a | Excellent | ||||
 |  |  |  | AbdM Thickness | ICC | n/a | 0.96 | n/a | n/a | Excellent |